Re: FS: Simon

["Petem" <petem001@xxxxxxxxx>]

"Jim" <alarminex@xxxxxxx> a écrit dans le message de news:
1159237701.909246.58620@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> Petem wrote:
>> Well if we cant have guns any more I wonder what is in that firearm box
>> that
>> is connected on my alarm system...
>>
>> Must be a club or maybe a bow?
>>
>> You better read and take some notes,we HAVE to register or fire arm,but
>> we
>> still keep em!
>>
>> And we can still shoot our heart out at some games,or on target practice
>>
>> we try to keep human shooting to place like Afghanistan ;-)
>> You know the firearm control politic here is kind of totally useless for
>> event like what occurred at Dawson college,but if some cops come my home
>> they will know I have some guns and wont rush in like they used to do,and
>> in
>> the mean time there is less risk for them and us,cause they will try to
>> understand what's happening before coming in and get excited by something
>> totally normal,like a man walking with a broom stick in his hand ;-)
>>
>
> Pete .... if you look in the history books of any nation that has
> mandated firearm registration, you'll find that the next step is
> confiscation. It's a slippery slope. Once the government begins to
> control the peoples ability to defend themselves, eventually the people
> find that it's the govenment that is their enemy.
>
> This was just shown to be true in New Orleans, in the days after
> Katrina. When the people who remained behind had no govenment, no
> police to protect them against people who were looting, assalting and
> raping, What did the government do?  They came in and took the firearms
> away from law abiding citizens so they couldn't protect themselves. How
> stupid can they be? There were all kinds of criminals running around
> assaulting people and the government takes the firearms away from the
> victims. The only good thing that happened as a result, was that the
> sale of firearms across the nation rose to new levels for months
> afterwards, once people saw what could happen to them, in any kind of
> an emergency or catastrophe.
>
> I just can't understand the logic and don't understand how anyone can
> justify keeping firearms away from law abiding citizens when they can't
> guarantee the publics safety or stop the criminals from having
> firearms. How can registration of firearms of law abiding Canadians
> stop criminals from committing gun crimes? It was just proven that it
> doesn't work by the Dawson event,  up there in Canada ..... yet nobody
> can put two and two together to come to the conclusion that "gun
> control laws" that keep firearms from law abiding citizens are
> ridiculous.
>
> (sorry .... Rant switch OFF)
>

I totally agree with you that this kind of law is useless against
criminal,its just a kind of way for the cop to know when they enter a house
if there is guns inside,so they can chicken out and call backups...