Re: Is low-priced Internet monitoring reliable?

["Russell Brill" <russwbrill@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

"blueman" <NOSPAM@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:m2lkow1ui8.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> "alarman" <alarman2000@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>> "blueman" <NOSPAM@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>> news:m2pse820np.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> > I doubt it.
>> > They actually like me because I have been something like a beta tester
>> > for their internet functionality. I also got to be quite friendly with
>> > some of their techs talking shop and trading technical
>> > computer/electronic insights -- their most experienced techs
>> > paradoxically perhaps are the ones who are least experienced and
>> > comfortable with "new-fangled" computer and Internet functionality.
>> > (Plus they are the ones who gave me the software tools to access and
>> > program my panel via the Internet.)
>>
>> I imagine it would be a management decision. The techs have no worries
>> about
>> liability; they are employees. Anyway, as I said, it's just a guess.
>> js
>
> It's an uninformed guess -- everyone got the same raise -- they blamed it
> on
> increased cost of fuel, transportation etc.
>
> Plus, I have spoken previously to the president of the company (it is
> one of the largest companies in New England) and we are on very
> good terms.
>
> Please, no more guessing or flame bait... the purpose of this thread
> was to inquire about 3rd party Internet monitoring not question
> whether or not there may be ulterior motives in the company's price
> increase.

Why do I keep hearing the Billy Squire song "Stroke" in my head???

:-))