Re: Hey Robert Campbell

["R.H.Campbell" <rh.campbell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Yawn.....zzzzzz.....

RHC

"Jim" <alarminex@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1136950833.076552.56850@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> R.H.Campbell wrote:
>> It is sufficient to say that his offering the industry standard
>> contractual
>> term doesn't imply I think he is ripping anyone off. That is just your
>> oversensitivity to my statement.
>
> Hmmm.
> Then what was the point in calling his client stupid? And haven't you
> said repeatedly in the past that anyone who uses long term contracts is
> ripping off their clients? With that in mind ..... how am I being "over
> sensitive"? Are you saying something different now or just trying to
> weasle out of what you said?
>
> With all the names that you've called dealers who use term contracts in
> the past, do you now contend that calling his client stupid carries no
> futher implications?
>
>>
>> And frankly, I don't care what you think about my monthly term way of
>> doing
>> business.
>
> I can understand that completely ........ and in a one or two time
> circumstance, simply out of politeness, that alone would deter someone
> from making further comments to you about it.
>
> However it seems that you can't understand that it works both ways. I
> (and I'd have to guess that the majority of people participating here
> ........  also) don't care what YOU think about long term contracts.
> But that doesn't seem to deter YOU from jumping up at every mention of
> the word 'contract' to tell us AAAAAGGGAIN what you think about them.
> Why is it ok for YOU to always bring out YOUR opinion and when called
> on it, you get all huffy  ....... like people should care about hearing
> YOUR policies?
>
> I sincerly hope that you do understand, that I also  really .... really
> ...don't care how you run your business. It's fine with me and I'm sure
> with everyone, regardless of what policies you have. But it is an
> important fact to note that as far as I can remember, neither I nor
> anyone else here has ever initiated any thread or interjected anything
> about the merits and benefits of term contracts. What that we could say
> the same about your pontification of YOUR contractual policies. Why is
> it ok for you to criticize and to insinuate fraud and deception on the
> part of anyone using term contracts and voice your opinion, (which is
> radically against the "Industry Standard Contractual Term")  but you
> don't think you should be criticized about what YOU do?
>
>>
>> We're not going down this pointless road again !
>>
>
> Not unless you lead the way, we wont.
>
> I noticed that you don't seem to have anything to say about the fact
> that it's always YOU who broaches the subject about how bad, term
> contracts are, but no one ever starts a thread or interjects about how
> stupid YOUR policies are. Yet you get your shorts is a knot when
> someone takes you to task for it. A little hypocritical there aren't we
> Bobby boy?
>
> If you don't want to go down the road Robert, then step on the brakes
> at the stop sign.  You know where it is.
>


I choose Polesoft Lockspam to fight spam, and you?
http://www.polesoft.com/refer.html