[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: CP-01

Subject: Re: CP-01
From: G. Morgan <alarmpro@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 03 Dec 2006 05:54:03 GMT
Newsgroups: alt.security.alarms
References: <vQ9ch.11094$_H5.6043@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1165075100.906725.303840@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <14a3n2dn7ocv312k03hk2l3q6118foc7k0@xxxxxxx> <1165077086.467318.310920@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

On 2 Dec 2006 08:31:26 -0800, "tourman" <rh.campbell@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

>Sounds like the big fellas like ADT with their normal 30 sec delay
>before transmission might have had their say in the makeup of that
>one.....


The whole fiasco is a damage control effort that was caused by the
likes of ADT in the first place.


--

-Graham

(delete the double e's to email)

References:
- CP-01
  - From: Roland Moore
- Re: CP-01
  - From: tourman
- Re: CP-01
  - From: G . Morgan
- Re: CP-01
  - From: tourman

Prev by Message: Re: CP-01
Next by Message: Re: ADT may come knocking...
Previous by thread: Re: CP-01
Next by thread: Re: CP-01
Index(es):
- Message
- Thread

alt.security.alarms Main Index | alt.security.alarms Thread Index | alt.security.alarms Home | Archives Home