[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: CP-01

Subject: Re: CP-01
From: "tourman" <rh.campbell@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 2 Dec 2006 08:31:26 -0800
Newsgroups: alt.security.alarms
References: <vQ9ch.11094$_H5.6043@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1165075100.906725.303840@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <14a3n2dn7ocv312k03hk2l3q6118foc7k0@xxxxxxx>

Ok, thanks Graham...

Sounds like the big fellas like ADT with their normal 30 sec delay
before transmission might have had their say in the makeup of that
one.....

RHC

G. Morgan wrote:
> On 2 Dec 2006 07:58:20 -0800, "tourman" <rh.campbell@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
> >I hate to show my ignorance, but what exactly is CP-01. I'm surprised
> >that DSC and Paradox haven't taken this into account (especially
> >Paradox).
>
>
> http://www.siacinc.org/standards.asp
>
> Basically what it means to you is:  it sets false alarm reduction
> defaults in panel programming that are unchangeable (like dial delay).
>
> --
>
> -Graham
>
> (delete the double e's to email)

Follow-Ups:
- Re: CP-01
  - From: Jim Rojas
- Re: CP-01
  - From: G . Morgan

References:
- CP-01
  - From: Roland Moore
- Re: CP-01
  - From: tourman
- Re: CP-01
  - From: G . Morgan

Prev by Message: Re: CP-01
Next by Message: Re: CP-01
Previous by thread: Re: CP-01
Next by thread: Re: CP-01
Index(es):
- Message
- Thread

alt.security.alarms Main Index | alt.security.alarms Thread Index | alt.security.alarms Home | Archives Home