Re: Bass Burhglar Alarms

["ssab" <emoh@xxxxxxxx>]

don't let up on him Frank, that is what he wants.  While at the same time
not giving a crap about what anyone else wants.  Don't let the 'bass for
brains' up once you have him down.

"Frank Olson" <Use_the_email_links@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:%IYbf.442969$tl2.169731@xxxxxxxxxxx
> robertlbass@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>
>> Wrong.  I simply logged on and posted.  There was neither a waltz nor
>> an expectation involved.  In fact, I pretty much expected you to do
>> exactly what you did, try to start a fight.  Sure enough...
>
> I've just reviewed my first post in response to yours.  There was no
> attempt at "starting a fight".  You have a pretty loose interpretation of
> what that all means.  ISTR that when you left, your last post was along
> the same line...  Be that as it may, I will "drop it" as everyone seems to
> think I should.  I'll be watching though!!!
>
>
>>
>>
>>>>Your continual vendetta against me has brought you repeated chastisement
>>>>from numerous regulars and visitors.
>>
>>
>>>>I'll post about security alarms and politely answer questions.  I
>>>>suggest you do the same.
>>
>>
>>>Fine.  Let's call this a "contract", shall we??
>>
>>
>> Call it anything you want.
>
> I'd say it's a contract.
>
>
>>
>>
>>>>and have everyone here...
>>
>>
>>>>You don't speak for "everyone here".
>>
>>
>>>Where did I say I did??
>>
>>
>> It was implied in your statement.
>
> I "imply" a lot of things don't I??
>
>
>>
>>
>>>>I suggest you let it go permanently.  The newsgroup will be better for
>>>>it.
>>
>>
>>>Done!  I shall adhere to the FAQ.
>>
>>
>> Good.
>
>
> But you snipped the last part.  Just as long as you're aware that it's
> still there *by implication*.
>
>
>>
>>
>>>>>As for BBA...  I should tell you to enable security alerts on your web
>>>>>browser (if you're using IE).
>>
>>
>>>>My browsers (IE, Netscape and Firefox) all show my pages without any
>>>>problems.
>>
>>
>>>>>You'll notice that every page you try to load comes up with a bogus
>>>>>message that you're cruising a "secure site".
>>
>>
>>>>Those messages are generated by your browser.
>>
>>
>>>As well as your customer's browsers...
>>
>>
>> As soon as one of my customers has the same problem you say you have
>> I'll deal with it.
>
> I doubt very much that you'll get a chance to.  Most will simply "move
> on".  As an online store you have *one chance* to attract their attention.
> Making it difficult for them to browse your site just frustrate the heck
> out of 'em and they'll leave.
>
>
>> I average over 800 unique hosts per day on each of
>> my two main websites.  So far you're the only one who says you have a
>> problem with security.
>
> That's because I take the time to tell you.  Of the "800 unique hits" per
> day that you get, how many actually stay to buy??  4??
>
>
>>
>>
>>>if they have the same security settings active.  All I'm saying is that
>>>you've got code in your header that IE (at the particular settings I
>>>employ) picks up.
>>
>>
>> You are 100% wrong.  There is no security code in the headers at all.
>
> It's probably not in the html.  Look at the css. Or the php.  It's there
> somewhere.
>
>
>>
>>
>>>It makes your site a "kludge"...
>>
>>
>> Well, let's see.  My websites are among the most popular in the
>> security industry.  Google rates my site a 5, the same as those of most
>> of the major manufacturers.
>
> Google's "rating" has to do with the number of sites that post your URL as
> well as the number of times it appears in your sig line in a Newsgroup.
> It has nothing to do with "popularity".  Most of the manufacturers sites
> are linked from many sources (distributors, dealers, news articles, etc.).
> The people at "Searchfit" have your various sites crossreferenced so often
> it's no wonder your ranking is "up there", but then that's what you're
> paying them the big bucks for.
>
>
>> I can't keep up with all the sales calls.
>> Last time I bothered to look, your website was rated 0 by Google.
>
> My "ranking" with Google isn't a concern.  It means nothing in the grand
> scheme of things.  Taking care of your customers, and the complaints on
> the BBB site are probably far more important than maintaining your Google
> ranking.
>
>
>>
>>
>>>If you don't appreciate the "critique", just say so
>>
>> and I'll keep my mouth shut about that too so you can go on your merry
>> way...  Mind you, your customers (those with higher security settings
>> in
>> their browsers) will too...
>>
>> Nope.  I don't appreciate your critique.  I'll take the risk that there
>> may be some customer out there who can't get past the non-existant
>> code.
>
> It's probably not "one".  More like the "779" that leave in frustration.
> You gotta get your priorities straight.