[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: 23. NEWBEES, if possible avoid wireless alarm systems

Subject: Re: 23. NEWBEES, if possible avoid wireless alarm systems
From: "Mark Leuck" <m..leuck@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 5 May 2005 20:35:44 -0500
Newsgroups: alt.security.alarms
References: <gsk801tu0740a3uk58u8u7p2dn0igc2por@xxxxxxx> <427a5164$1_4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <NCsee.22$137.4365@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Ygzee.1236991$6l.577842@pd7tw2no>

"Frank Olson" <feolson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:Ygzee.1236991$6l.577842@xxxxxxxxxxx
>
> "Crash Gordon®" <NONE@xxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:NCsee.22$137.4365@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> OH...but I do see that he has installed an RFI free wired alarm!....I
wonder
> what kind...probably Waffle Shack !! :-)
>
> Very similar in looks to the "Loxxon".  And equally effective...  The link
I
> had no longer points to the specific unit.  It appears it's no longer
being
> sold.

Thats because Evergreen now has new models out,

He had the HA-50 and I think the web site now shows the HA-52 etc

Follow-Ups:
- Re: 23. NEWBEES, if possible avoid wireless alarm systems
  - From: Frank Olson

References:
- Re: 23. NEWBEES, if possible avoid wireless alarm systems
  - From: Robert L Bass
- Re: 23. NEWBEES, if possible avoid wireless alarm systems
  - From: Crash Gordon®
- Re: 23. NEWBEES, if possible avoid wireless alarm systems
  - From: Frank Olson

Prev by Message: Re: Question for group on Pull stations?
Next by Message: Re: The MM & Jiminex show (was: Bass...)
Previous by thread: Re: 23. NEWBEES, if possible avoid wireless alarm systems
Next by thread: Re: 23. NEWBEES, if possible avoid wireless alarm systems
Index(es):
- Message
- Thread

alt.security.alarms Main Index | alt.security.alarms Thread Index | alt.security.alarms Home | Archives Home