[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: 23. NEWBEES, if possible avoid wireless alarm systems

Subject: Re: 23. NEWBEES, if possible avoid wireless alarm systems
From: "Robert L. Bass" <robertlbass@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 5 May 2005 21:24:54 -0400
Newsgroups: alt.security.alarms
References: <gsk801tu0740a3uk58u8u7p2dn0igc2por@xxxxxxx> <427a5164$1_4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <NCsee.22$137.4365@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Ygzee.1236991$6l.577842@pd7tw2no>

> Very similar in looks to the "Loxxon".  And equally effective...  The link
> I had no longer points to the specific unit.  It appears it's no longer
> being sold.

What?  No Loxx?  A lot of people in Brooklyn are going to be very upset
about this.  ;~}

References:
- Re: 23. NEWBEES, if possible avoid wireless alarm systems
  - From: Robert L Bass
- Re: 23. NEWBEES, if possible avoid wireless alarm systems
  - From: Crash Gordon®
- Re: 23. NEWBEES, if possible avoid wireless alarm systems
  - From: Frank Olson

Prev by Message: Re: Mag Locks
Next by Message: Re: DSC Maxsys PC 4020 Reporting Probs. UPDATE
Previous by thread: Re: 23. NEWBEES, if possible avoid wireless alarm systems
Next by thread: Re: 23. NEWBEES, if possible avoid wireless alarm systems
Index(es):
- Message
- Thread

alt.security.alarms Main Index | alt.security.alarms Thread Index | alt.security.alarms Home | Archives Home