[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: 23. NEWBEES, if possible avoid wireless alarm systems

Subject: Re: 23. NEWBEES, if possible avoid wireless alarm systems
From: "Frank Olson" <feolson@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 06 May 2005 00:56:24 GMT
Newsgroups: alt.security.alarms
References: <gsk801tu0740a3uk58u8u7p2dn0igc2por@xxxxxxx> <427a5164$1_4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <NCsee.22$137.4365@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

"Crash Gordon®" <NONE@xxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:NCsee.22$137.4365@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

OH...but I do see that he has installed an RFI free wired alarm!....I wonder
what kind...probably Waffle Shack !! :-)

Very similar in looks to the "Loxxon".  And equally effective...  The link I
had no longer points to the specific unit.  It appears it's no longer being
sold.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: 23. NEWBEES, if possible avoid wireless alarm systems
  - From: Robert L. Bass
- Re: 23. NEWBEES, if possible avoid wireless alarm systems
  - From: Mark Leuck

References:
- Re: 23. NEWBEES, if possible avoid wireless alarm systems
  - From: Robert L Bass
- Re: 23. NEWBEES, if possible avoid wireless alarm systems
  - From: Crash Gordon®

Prev by Message: Re: DSC 632 hybrid system: Multiple contacts on one transmitter
Next by Message: Re: Why Don't You Like DSC? (Addressed to those that don't.)
Previous by thread: Re: 23. NEWBEES, if possible avoid wireless alarm systems
Next by thread: Re: 23. NEWBEES, if possible avoid wireless alarm systems
Index(es):
- Message
- Thread

alt.security.alarms Main Index | alt.security.alarms Thread Index | alt.security.alarms Home | Archives Home