Re: 23. NEWBEES, if possible avoid wireless alarm systems

["Robert L Bass" <sales@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

The above post is another example of "Paul's" suddenly improved English
grammar.  It's the kind of thing Leuck claims he doesn't post.  It is one of
several reasons I believe the Troll Formerly Known as Paul is not only not
Belgian but most likely an American.

Advanced trolls often use fake personalities as part of their ruse.  It's
all a game to get the regulars to respond and, preferably, to irritate them.
TFKP is a classic example.

<--> wrote in message news:gsk801tu0740a3uk58u8u7p2dn0igc2por@xxxxxxxxxx
>
> They are not reliable and are dead on warning when a transmitter
> operates in a condition who muzzle the wireless alarm system.
> This is easily done with Radio Transmitters operating:
> - ON the wireless frequency
> - Saturating the receiver
> - Intermodulation
> - Harmonics
> - Falling in the receiver bandpass
> - On the IF frequency
> - and more...
> This is what i call basically Radio Frequency Interferences (RFI) but
> in fact it covers, like you can notice above a lot more.
> In essence the problems is the fact that by no way two (or more)
> systems can use simultaneously the same frequency, its called
> collisions, interferences and more like you see above.
>
> The WORST is that the OWNER DON'T KNOW THAT HISS alarm system is no
> longer operational, no message (20 years records hold by so called
> experienced professionals: no RFI alarm).
>
> Use a wired systems and use WIRELESS only when impossible to wire, but
> BE AWARE that YOUR SAFETY IS HAZARDOUS (my system was dead during more
> than one year before i found out by accident and measuring the
> wireless receiver output signal content).
> Muzzling can occurs permanently or occasionally, mine was permanent.
>
> Note: So called low level mechanically (who claim them self
> professional) try to let you believe that my system was dumb and/or
> badly installed and they don't realize that it is an external
> influences that can't be avoided whatever wireless alarm system you
> have.
> Its a pure radio communication problem know by telecommunication
> specialists.
> There is a way around for $$$ investments but that is out of reach of
> a wireless alarm system.
>
> Paul
> NOTE: My system is replaced with a wired one, do the same.
>