[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: 23. NEWBEES, if possible avoid wireless alarm systems

Subject: Re: 23. NEWBEES, if possible avoid wireless alarm systems
From: "Frank Olson" <feolson@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 06 May 2005 02:55:14 GMT
Newsgroups: alt.security.alarms
References: <gsk801tu0740a3uk58u8u7p2dn0igc2por@xxxxxxx> <427a5164$1_4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <NCsee.22$137.4365@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Ygzee.1236991$6l.577842@pd7tw2no> <66CdnWOqM9XqVOffRVn-gg@xxxxxxxxxxx>

"Mark Leuck" <m..leuck@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:66CdnWOqM9XqVOffRVn-gg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

>
> Thats because Evergreen now has new models out,
>
> He had the HA-50 and I think the web site now shows the HA-52 etc


You mean they've "improved" it??  Now you can "muzzle" it with with your TV
remote...

References:
- Re: 23. NEWBEES, if possible avoid wireless alarm systems
  - From: Robert L Bass
- Re: 23. NEWBEES, if possible avoid wireless alarm systems
  - From: Crash Gordon®
- Re: 23. NEWBEES, if possible avoid wireless alarm systems
  - From: Frank Olson
- Re: 23. NEWBEES, if possible avoid wireless alarm systems
  - From: Mark Leuck

Prev by Message: Re: Seeking The Best DIY Alarm Consultant
Next by Message: Re: Roof Space detectors
Previous by thread: Re: 23. NEWBEES, if possible avoid wireless alarm systems
Next by thread: Re: 23. NEWBEES, if possible avoid wireless alarm systems
Index(es):
- Message
- Thread

alt.security.alarms Main Index | alt.security.alarms Thread Index | alt.security.alarms Home | Archives Home