[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: New readers, wireless is junk

Subject: Re: New readers, wireless is junk
From: "Robert L. Bass" <robertlbass@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2005 10:26:31 -0500
Newsgroups: alt.security.alarms
References: <3cre41pi5og1dg6bnii3icep5tm7079e1o@xxxxxxx> <ehK1e.28$207.378@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <gjse419jddvqijn8avd7dohiunnes1msel@xxxxxxx> <jLL1e.79$X72.1656@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <r23f415l6l3jhno6h61crnedv8796nfefn@xxxxxxx> <rLU1e.1$Vg.251@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <gbWdneTZ0qX_hNXfRVn-vw@xxxxxxxxxxx> <oXU1e.4$Vg.264@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

> I thought someone had found his addr.??

Take a look at his posts over a period of time.  His English ranges from
almost unintelligible pidgin talk to nearly perfect grammar.  The entire
story of a failed alarm was a fiction.  His *only* purpose in posting is to
get people to argue with him.  When you (or anyone else, for that matter)
post remarks about him that just fulfills his goal here.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: New readers, wireless is junk
  - From: Crash Gordon®
- Re: New readers, wireless is junk
  - From: Mark Leuck
- Re: New readers, wireless is junk
  - From: -pull

References:
- New readers, wireless is junk
  - From: -pull
- Re: New readers, wireless is junk
  - From: Crash Gordon®
- Re: New readers, wireless is junk
  - From: -pull
- Re: New readers, wireless is junk
  - From: Crash Gordon®
- Re: New readers, wireless is junk
  - From: -pull
- Re: New readers, wireless is junk
  - From: Crash Gordon®
- Re: New readers, wireless is junk
  - From: Robert L. Bass
- Re: New readers, wireless is junk
  - From: Crash Gordon®

Prev by Message: Re: Alarm Tech Jobs
Next by Message: Re: CADDX NX-6 question from homeowner
Previous by thread: Re: New readers, wireless is junk
Next by thread: Re: New readers, wireless is junk
Index(es):
- Message
- Thread

alt.security.alarms Main Index | alt.security.alarms Thread Index | alt.security.alarms Home | Archives Home