Re: New readers, wireless is junk

[Crash Gordon® <NONE@xxxxxxxx>]

Simplistic concepts yah, misinterpreted yah, misquoted =
yah...writing?...you have no talent for that. Maybe it'd be better if  =
you posted your comments in your mother tongue.


<-pull@shoot> wrote in message =
news:r23f415l6l3jhno6h61crnedv8796nfefn@xxxxxxxxxx
> Poor guy,
>  Show your knowledge base with technical justified posts or is this
> "low level electrician" to highly quoted too?
>=20
> In that alarm business obviously YOU don't possess the meager
> intellectual capacity required to understand the simplistic concepts
> of what I write, so please don't overestimate your talent, you are
> judged by others too.
>=20
> On Sun, 27 Mar 2005 21:28:19 -0700, Crash Gordon=AE <NONE@xxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
> >actually dood, I'm a very high level electrician.
> >take the peanutbutter outta yer ears.
>=20
> ><-pull@shoot> wrote in message =
news:gjse419jddvqijn8avd7dohiunnes1msel@xxxxxxxxxx
> >>=20
> >> Again beside the question with your post dear "low level =
electrician".
> >>  Why do some pro's say:
> >> - they had no warning of RFI presence and
> >> - others say there are RFI nuisances..
> >>  Does really that manufacturer "unsupported" RFI detection exist(?) =
in
> >> the panel OR is the system just dead on any alarm giving?
> =20
> >> On Sun, 27 Mar 2005 19:48:03 -0700, Crash Gordon=AE <NONE@xxxxxxxx>
> >> wrote:
> >>=20
> >> >Hey wackboy!
> >> >
> >> >So it was YOU who discovered RFI huh? What else have you =
discovered?...Lithium? Zoloft?
> >> >
> >> >No one here denies the existence of RFI...just we hardy ever have =
a problem with it. And when if (conditional tense used here) we do ... =
the alarm panel WILL notify us of the presence of jamming.
> >> >
> >> >The piece of crap you bought failed...get over it.
>=20
> >> ><-pull@shoot> wrote in message =
news:3cre41pi5og1dg6bnii3icep5tm7079e1o@xxxxxxxxxx
> >> >>=20
> >> >> "So called pro's" in that alarm business obviously don't possess =
the
> >> >> meager intellectual capacity required to understand the =
simplistic
> >> >> concepts of what I write, so please don't overestimate theyre =
talent
> >> >> to judge others.
> >> >>=20
> >> >> Its now since 4 years that i mentioned:
> >> >> -  Wireless Alarm Systems are UNRELIABLE during
> >> >>     Radio Frequency Interferences (RFI);
> >> >> -  Theyre is no warning that the wireless system is muzzled to =
dead.
> >> >>=20
> >> >> Some "so called" Pro's come to the conclusion:
> >> >> 1. RFI exist and can't be avoided;
> >> >> 2. There is a RFI detection in the "modern" wireless alarm =
systems.
> >> >> 3. The wireless alarm systems are working fine, no RFI detected
> >> >>    since 20+ years and 100000+ systems;
> >> >> 4. They have no RFI reliability measurement tools except theyre
> >> >>    on site experience;
> >> >> 5. There is no manufacturer support on that RFI subject.
> >> >>=20
> >> >> Even if a "unsupported by manufacturers" RFI detection exist(?) =
its
> >> >> strange that they have NO RFI alert/warnings.
> >> >>=20
> >> >> Instead of having a closer look to the problem (Pro's discovered =
it
> >> >> for the first time when i mentioned it 4 years ago), no they =
prefere
> >> >> to act theyre way with  insults, by denigrating, attempt to =
spoil my
> >> >> posts with out of context posts, attempt to avoid my posts by =
calling
> >> >> my provider, ++
> >> >>=20
> >> >> How is it possible that they are so UNprofessional. Why do they =
not
> >> >> call the manufacturers?
>=20
>