Re: New readers, wireless is junk

[Crash Gordon® <NONE@xxxxxxxx>]

Hey wackboy!

So it was YOU who discovered RFI huh? What else have you =
discovered?...Lithium? Zoloft?

No one here denies the existence of RFI...just we hardy ever have a =
problem with it. And when if (conditional tense used here) we do ... the =
alarm panel WILL notify us of the presence of jamming.

The piece of crap you bought failed...get over it.



<-pull@shoot> wrote in message =
news:3cre41pi5og1dg6bnii3icep5tm7079e1o@xxxxxxxxxx
>=20
> "So called pro's" in that alarm business obviously don't possess the
> meager intellectual capacity required to understand the simplistic
> concepts of what I write, so please don't overestimate theyre talent
> to judge others.
>=20
> Its now since 4 years that i mentioned:
> -  Wireless Alarm Systems are UNRELIABLE during
>     Radio Frequency Interferences (RFI);
> -  Theyre is no warning that the wireless system is muzzled to dead.
>=20
> Some "so called" Pro's come to the conclusion:
> 1. RFI exist and can't be avoided;
> 2. There is a RFI detection in the "modern" wireless alarm systems.
> 3. The wireless alarm systems are working fine, no RFI detected
>    since 20+ years and 100000+ systems;
> 4. They have no RFI reliability measurement tools except theyre
>    on site experience;
> 5. There is no manufacturer support on that RFI subject.
>=20
> Even if a "unsupported by manufacturers" RFI detection exist(?) its
> strange that they have NO RFI alert/warnings.
>=20
> Instead of having a closer look to the problem (Pro's discovered it
> for the first time when i mentioned it 4 years ago), no they prefere
> to act theyre way with  insults, by denigrating, attempt to spoil my
> posts with out of context posts, attempt to avoid my posts by calling
> my provider, ++
>=20
> How is it possible that they are so UNprofessional. Why do they not
> call the manufacturers?
>=20
>