Re: Napco Wireless Gem-PIR

[Crash Gordon® <webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Ah..didn't realize it was wireless. Yes, wireless pirs are usually =
designed to trip only every couple of minutes to save battery life.


"Russell Brill" <russwbrill@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message =
news:RMKve.9775$NX4.7527@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| Wireless PIR's fall asleep for a couple of minutes after each =
activation to=20
| conserve the batteries........ Regards, Russ
|=20
| "Crash Gordon=AE" <webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message=20
| news:DDKve.76$FR6.45714@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| I don't use the Gem...but
|=20
| Depends on how they are set, what they are looking at, room activity =
when=20
| testing, mounting height,...etc. Read the directions on what the =
settings=20
| should be. If you're going by the led stay out of the room for 5 =
minutes or=20
| so then walk test it.
|=20
|=20
| "jjsmd" <jjsmd@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message=20
| news:1119840321.194379.254320@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| | I am trying to use the Napco Gem-PIR with my 9600 board, and I have =
the
| | following question:
| |
| | When motion occurs at my other motion detectors(wired) the board =
very
| | quickly detects  zone Open and then zone Closed, and there does not =
see
| | to be a period where the next motion is not detected for a period of
| | time. In other words if someone is walking back and forth 4 or 5 =
times
| | it will register Open,closed,open,closed,open  etc...
| |
| | On the other hand with the gem-pir after the first Open and Closed =
it
| | seems to have a down time where the next motion doesn't register for
| | quite a while. Is this inherent in the Gem-Pir , is it able to be
| | modified?
| |
| | Any help appreciated.
| |=20
|=20
|