[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: CCTV Cameras

Subject: Re: CCTV Cameras
From: cctvbahamas@xxxxxxxxxxx
Date: 28 Aug 2005 17:32:13 -0700
Newsgroups: alt.security.alarms
References: <1125088738.040920.255630@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <DpydnWtl5tuDPpLeRVn-uQ@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <sradnRqn3vEXIpLeRVn-sQ@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <nKidnfukC5wVQ5LeRVn-jA@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <1125156675.656470.106680@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1125157885.631133.320970@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1125176785.338602.145860@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1125207125.408376.253020@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <drWdnTN9Yb34D4zeRVn-gQ@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <1125231105.973663.178010@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <WbCdnZ2dnZ1m7r76nZ2dnaNdjN6dnZ2dRVn-0J2dnZ0@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

" No Rory, it's not Wi Fi, or 802.11x. It's 900 MHz spread spectrum,
point to
point.
There's no degraded quality difference between being on a 100 Base-T,
or the
bridge.
The camera functions the same, at the same quality. "

If it is video over network then it IS degraded video.

900Mhz 15 miles, yeah right!

Follow-Ups:
- Re: CCTV Cameras
  - From: Jackcsg

References:
- CCTV Cameras
  - From: Socrates
- Re: CCTV Cameras
  - From: Jackcsg
- Re: CCTV Cameras
  - From: Bob La Londe
- Re: CCTV Cameras
  - From: Jackcsg
- Re: CCTV Cameras
  - From: Socrates
- Re: CCTV Cameras
  - From: cctvbahamas
- Re: CCTV Cameras
  - From: Socrates
- Re: CCTV Cameras
  - From: cctvbahamas
- Re: CCTV Cameras
  - From: Jackcsg
- Re: CCTV Cameras
  - From: cctvbahamas
- Re: CCTV Cameras
  - From: Jackcsg

Prev by Message: Re: Surge Protection?
Next by Message: Re: Graham MIA?
Previous by thread: Re: CCTV Cameras
Next by thread: Re: CCTV Cameras
Index(es):
- Message
- Thread

alt.security.alarms Main Index | alt.security.alarms Thread Index | alt.security.alarms Home | Archives Home