[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: garage remote jamming

Subject: Re: garage remote jamming
From: nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxx (Dave Houston)
Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2007 10:07:19 GMT
Newsgroups: comp.home.automation
References: <45e436ff.577551531@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <slrneu9she.2ck.njc@xxxxxxxxxxx> <45e56b79.656520859@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <dZudnUaUzvLjDXjYnZ2dnUVZ_veinZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <F4idnXHJpcq7WHjYnZ2dnUVZ_o_inZ2d@xxxxxxx> <45e5d3ff.683278937@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <7qednRddSqih1nrYnZ2dnUVZ_tSunZ2d@xxxxxxx> <45e774c5.789970453@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <9N2dncOwPcN7VHrYnZ2dnUVZ_vTinZ2d@xxxxxxx>

"Robert Green" <ROBERT_GREEN1963@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>So in reality, X-10 is the one that actually "uses a frequency different
>from most remote controls, cellular/portable phones, and other wireless
>devices" not RadioRA.  How ironic!

Except that X-10 also uses 418MHz for its Powermids.

>Really?  I don't remember him revealing that he was any more than a
>satisfied customer.  Did I miss a post?

It's his level of satisfaction and a mention that he left some test gear at
a client that make me suspicious. ;)

http://davehouston.net
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/roZetta/
roZetta-subscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Follow-Ups:
- Re: garage remote jamming
  - From: Bill Kearney
- Re: garage remote jamming
  - From: Robert Green

References:
- Re: garage remote jamming
  - From: Robert Green
- Re: garage remote jamming
  - From: Dave Houston
- Re: garage remote jamming
  - From: Robert Green

Prev by Message: Re: CAT5 568A v. 568B..Hmmm..odd problem?
Next by Message: Re: CAT5 568A v. 568B..Hmmm..odd problem?
Previous by thread: Re: garage remote jamming
Next by thread: Re: garage remote jamming
Index(es):
- Message
- Thread

comp.home.automation Main Index | comp.home.automation Thread Index | comp.home.automation Home | Archives Home