Re: Trying to wrap my head around it

[mleuck <m.leuck@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Oct 22, 8:22=A0pm, JoeRaisin <joeraisin2...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 10/22/2011 5:17 PM, mleuck wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Oct 21, 3:23 am, G. Morgan<G_Mor...@xxxxxxxx> =A0wrote:
> >> mleuck Wrote:
>
> >>> On Oct 20, 7:14 am, G. Morgan<G_Mor...@xxxxxxxx> =A0wrote:
> >>>> Jim Rojas Wrote:
>
> >>>>> ADT has their own variation of CID codes in these panels. It sounds=
 like
> >>>>> a bug.
>
> >>>> And who are they to redefine CID for proprietary panels? =A0What a j=
oke.
>
> >>> It would be a joke if they did it which they don't
>
> >> Not the last time I looked. =A0I know they have "extended" codes for
> >> proprietary use on new-gen panels, but not on a SW/3000 over a dozen
> >> years old.
>
> > Extended codes yes but redefining old codes no, besides the 3000 is a
> > Vista-20P and one can go into the configurable zone section and
> > reprogram zones to send anything
>
> This one wasn't programmed as a configurable zone - simple entry/exit.
>
> Mark, been meaning to ask you something but I'm not sure if I remember
> something right. =A0I think I have seen posts in the past indicating you
> may have some knowledge of ADT systems.
>
> I can't figure out what point type a motion detector should be on a
> Focus panel. =A0There is no "interior follower" or anything that seems
> like one. =A0The ADT techs I have asked say they just make them either
> delayed or instant perimeter types based on where they are.
>
> Why do they have to rename stuff?

It depends on the Focus panel, they had everyone from Moose, DSC and
Ademco making their stuff