Re: Automatic fire sprinklers

[nick markowitz <nmarkowitz@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Jan 15, 11:54=A0am, Smitty Two <prestwh...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> In article
> <d3b9024a-be23-4f66-9444-2a1b8ce51...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
>
> =A0Evan <evan.news.re...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > ... airbags became
> > a requirement in cars because people were failing to use the
> > seatbelts...
>
> I'm not looking around intentionally for things to disagree with you on,
> but you make some irrational assumptions about things.
>
> Airbags are known by the acronym SRS for a reason. They were *never*
> intended to replace seatbelts. The issue of people not wearing seatbelts
> was addressed with seatbelt laws, not airbags.

here want to see some code double talk here is a comment on new arc
fault protection they ant put into old wiring which actually provides
no protection