Re: Automatic fire sprinklers

[Jim <alarminex@xxxxxxx>]

On Jan 11, 9:35=A0pm, mleuck <m.le...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Jan 11, 1:38=A0pm, "Doug" <d...@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > "zek" <ze...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>
> >news:1787d992-705c-4b2c-8386-e0d382b66d63@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx=
.
>
> > >All the new homes I see built are for the rich. Screw them.
> > >Contractors
> > >don't want to build cheap houses. They make more money on the big
> > >ones.
> > >All the poorer people have to settle for used stuff. The people that
> > >don't like national
> > >health insurance, don't have many friends that need it.
> > >greg
>
> > and your point is?
>
> > Doug
>
> I "think" his point is this
>
> Rich people buy nice houses and therefore are bad
> Poor people don't buy nice houses which is also bad
> Some people know many people who don't sign on to an socialist heath
> care plan because they aren't sick
>
> I could be wrong-

Ya know ..... I think your on to something there.

That all sounds pretty reasonable to me.

That allows us to conclude that there's no difference between rich
people and poor people. And since it's ok for the government to pass
laws for our own protection .... if a law was passed that required
everyone to stay healthy, there'd be no reason for any kind of health
care plan ..... at all !

OHMYGOD!  Why didn't you think of this before now?