Re: Moose/Sentol

[mleuck <m.leuck@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Oct 2, 1:54=A0pm, G. Morgan <usenet_ab...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> tourman <robercampb...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> <snip the education part-- thanks>
>
> >The PAL might seem onerous but overall it is a good piece of licensing
> >that serves to ensure those who shouldn't have legal firearms are
> >prevented from doing so, plus ensures all gun owners are trained in
> >safe handling and storage etc. BUT THAT'S AS FAR AS IT SHOULD
> >GO !!!!!!! Further registries do nothing to enhance public safety and
> >only serve to control and restrict those guns that legitimate owners
> >possess....
>
> Well, if it is how you describe it I completely agree. =A0Ever see the ol=
d 80's
> movie "Red Dawn"? =A0It's about the Soviets invading US soil. =A0The firs=
t thing
> they did was to round up all the registered gun owners and detain them. =
=A0

It doesn't take the Soviets invading to do that, during Katrina the
local police did the same thing

Blatantly against the law but they always apologize and admit fault
after the fact when the population might have needed those weapons.