Re: How's All-American Alarm Monitoring?

["Bob La Londe" <none@xxxxxxx>]

"mleuck" <m.leuck@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:0d42ff09-a4cd-47c2-b778-3d28808e75fe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> On Jun 16, 11:47 am, "Bob La Londe" <nos...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> "Pool_Player" <sja...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>>
>> news:hv5ofa$ieb$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>>
>>
>> > On 6/11/2010 3:40 PM, tourman wrote:
>> >> On Jun 9, 10:20 am, "Rockytsquirrel"<g...@xxxxxxx>  wrote:
>> >>> well except for dispatching the police for a weekly test
>> >>> (repeatedly),
>> >>> they
>> >>> do about an average job..
>>
>> >>> "Pool_Player"<sja...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>  wrote in message
>>
>> >>>news:hun90j$uv3$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>> >>>> Over the last few years, it seems, I've gotten a lot of post card
>> >>>> that
>> >>>> advertised All-American Alarm Monitoring.
>>
>> >>>> Anyone ever use them? Good or bad?
>>
>> >> RHC: Wow !! Weekly test report = one dispatch = $80 fine= $320 per
>> >> month monitoring ! Jeez....I wish I could charge that kind of rate !!
>> >> A hell of a station you got there....:)))
>> > Your claim is hard to believe. Are you saying there were four
>> > dispatches
>> > (police and/or fire and/or ambulance), one week after the other, for
>> > each
>> > of four weeks, and nothing was done by the responsible alarm
>> > installation
>> > company to investigate the reasons for the wrongful dispatches and
>> > nothing
>> > was done to find an early resolution to the problem with All-American
>> > Monitoring? It's hard to believe that the responsible alarm
>> > installation
>> > company would let the tests continue after, say, the second wrongful
>> > dispatch. A third false dispatch after a test would be irresponsible,
>> > and
>> > a fourth would be absolutely ridiculous. So, I think it's more likely
>> > that
>> > either the alarm installation company did not perform the tests
>> > properly,
>> > or it never happened to begin with. If it did happen like you said,
>> > then
>> > it's the responsible alarm installation company's fault for not finding
>> > an
>> > early resolution to the problem. Also, it's not my station. I work for
>> > an
>> > alarm company seeking an alternative monitoring company to outsource
>> > our
>> > monitoring services. Do you represent or work for an alarm monitoring
>> > company?
>>
>> What?!  You now sound like a spammer promoting All American with your
>> query
>> and then getting pissed because somebody posted how they had a bad
>> experience.  Then you totally misread what somebody else posted in
>> commentary about that and went off the deep end.  Good luck.  Your little
>> charade totally failed.  I was actually considering All American atleast
>> in
>> passing, but you made me decide to send them a demand letter to remove my
>> address from their mailing list instead.  Good job.
>
> I doubt it's a spammer, he'd have posted a link telling everyone to go
> then come back and say what they think, list all of the services
> offered by the station in far greater detail than a normally curious
> person would do, then he'd tell how great his service with them while
> appearing concerned about potential long-term issues which is why he's
> supposedly here in the first place.
>
> Besides while I know nothing about All American I seriously doubt they
> or any other monitoring station have to resort to spamming a small
> newsgroup like this for business.

What about co-operative central stations?  LOL.  Or don't they count?

I was just busting the guy Mark.  You should have played along.  Oh, well.
It still amused me for a minute this morning.