Re: ADT-Broadview reaction

[Jim Rojas <jrojas@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

mleuck wrote:
> On Jan 30, 6:55 am, Jim Rojas<jro...@xxxxxxxxxxxx>  wrote:
>>> mleuck wrote:
>>> They can't keep the Brinks name which was why they renamed to
>>> Broadview. It will be a gradual consolidation with the installation
>>> and service arms staying exactly like they are now and ADT slowly
>>> absorbing the administrative side.
>>
>> Maybe Brinks, Inc. finally realized what a huge white elephant their
>> security division was, and strategically decided to get rid of it. As
>> they did their other major holdings in the past.
>>
>> Jim Rojas
>
> The security division was profitable and had name recognition, the
> reason for the sale was because some investors wanted to concentrate
> on the armored truck division. Same reason they dumped BAX in 2006
>
> I realize you have a thing against Brinks but at least get some of the
> facts right

This isn't a court of law...FACTS are irrelevant in this case... LMAO

Jim Rojas