[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: ADT-Broadview reaction



On Jan 30, 12:38=A0pm, mleuck <m.le...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Jan 30, 6:55=A0am, Jim Rojas <jro...@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > > mleuck wrote:
> > > They can't keep the Brinks name which was why they renamed to
> > > Broadview. It will be a gradual consolidation with the installation
> > > and service arms staying exactly like they are now and ADT slowly
> > > absorbing the administrative side.
>
> > Maybe Brinks, Inc. finally realized what a huge white elephant their
> > security division was, and strategically decided to get rid of it. As
> > they did their other major holdings in the past.
>
> > Jim Rojas
>
> The security division was profitable and had name recognition, the
> reason for the sale was because some investors wanted to concentrate
> on the armored truck division. Same reason they dumped BAX in 2006
>
> I realize you have a thing against Brinks but at least get some of the
> facts right <

If I ever appear on Who Wants to be a Millionaire (as if I need the
pay cut) I would want you on the life line. You're the Cliff Clayvern
of ASA.

Be happy they got swallowed up. More pie for the rest of us.



alt.security.alarms Main Index | alt.security.alarms Thread Index | alt.security.alarms Home | Archives Home