[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: ADT-Broadview reaction

Subject: Re: ADT-Broadview reaction
From: Jim Rojas <jrojas@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2010 07:55:52 -0500
Newsgroups: alt.security.alarms
References: <hjt979$n91$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <98178b51-11d7-49e9-b411-6ec77621d739@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <ead31429-b396-4144-9176-994e4cada666@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <119f3ce9-1673-4c2f-bbc1-3c87c30112c4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

> mleuck wrote:
> They can't keep the Brinks name which was why they renamed to
> Broadview. It will be a gradual consolidation with the installation
> and service arms staying exactly like they are now and ADT slowly
> absorbing the administrative side.

Maybe Brinks, Inc. finally realized what a huge white elephant their
security division was, and strategically decided to get rid of it. As
they did their other major holdings in the past.

Jim Rojas

Follow-Ups:
- Re: ADT-Broadview reaction
  - From: mleuck
- Re: ADT-Broadview reaction
  - From: Robert L Bass

References:
- ADT-Broadview reaction
  - From: Jim Rojas
- Re: ADT-Broadview reaction
  - From: nick markowitz
- Re: ADT-Broadview reaction
  - From: tourman
- Re: ADT-Broadview reaction
  - From: mleuck

Prev by Message: Re: What is this thing?
Next by Message: Re: What is this thing?
Previous by thread: Re: ADT-Broadview reaction
Next by thread: Re: ADT-Broadview reaction
Index(es):
- Message
- Thread

alt.security.alarms Main Index | alt.security.alarms Thread Index | alt.security.alarms Home | Archives Home