Re: ADT-Broadview reaction

[mleuck <m.leuck@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Jan 30, 6:55=A0am, Jim Rojas <jro...@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > mleuck wrote:
> > They can't keep the Brinks name which was why they renamed to
> > Broadview. It will be a gradual consolidation with the installation
> > and service arms staying exactly like they are now and ADT slowly
> > absorbing the administrative side.
>
> Maybe Brinks, Inc. finally realized what a huge white elephant their
> security division was, and strategically decided to get rid of it. As
> they did their other major holdings in the past.
>
> Jim Rojas

The security division was profitable and had name recognition, the
reason for the sale was because some investors wanted to concentrate
on the armored truck division. Same reason they dumped BAX in 2006

I realize you have a thing against Brinks but at least get some of the
facts right