[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: Another dumb ass tech

Subject: Re: Another dumb ass tech
From: mleuck <m.leuck@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 1 Jan 2010 07:33:27 -0800 (PST)
Newsgroups: alt.security.alarms
References: <0eb1342e-5e7d-47e4-9b9c-20c92f3f770a@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <sb2dnV5Zgqf9jqHWnZ2dnUVZ_g6dnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <xYU_m.22$pL2.14@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <3d83cf5b-0420-4871-88f0-5b54104b273f@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <5b67cc48-5237-4d06-bebd-c2c71dfdd68f@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <0cd49188-c2d4-4af1-bfa7-07382fb17342@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <3de90421-3ffb-4378-a2c1-22276f019565@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

On Jan 1, 8:45=A0am, tourman <robercampb...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Jan 1, 4:28=A0am, mleuck <m.le...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > What is ADT's attrition rate Robert?
>
> RHC: You know darn well that is a highly kept secret for PR reasons.
> However, I do know the attrition rate of another large company and
> ADT's is equal or worse. So my guess would be somewhere between 7% to
> 20%. The exact number doesn't matter so much as the fact that they
> either don't care, or simply accept it as an unavoidable fact of life
> for a large corporation.

How do you know ADT's is equal or worse than that other large company?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Another dumb ass tech
  - From: tourman

References:
- Re: Another dumb ass tech
  - From: tourman
- Re: Another dumb ass tech
  - From: mleuck
- Re: Another dumb ass tech
  - From: tourman

Prev by Message: Re: Another dumb ass tech
Next by Message: Re: PERS2400
Previous by thread: Re: Another dumb ass tech
Next by thread: Re: Another dumb ass tech
Index(es):
- Message
- Thread

alt.security.alarms Main Index | alt.security.alarms Thread Index | alt.security.alarms Home | Archives Home