Re: EMG (Ripoff) Security of Sarasota

[nick markowitz <nmarkowitz@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Jan 24, 3:13=A0am, mleuck <m.le...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Jan 23, 11:46=A0pm, "Robert L Bass" <nore...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
>
> > I recently gave a system to a friend of mine for his home. =A0It's a Na=
pco P1632.
> > He decided to have it monitored so he called EMG, a local outfit. =A0Th=
ey sent a
> > salesman out. The guy told my friend that the Napco system is non-stand=
ard and
> > that no central station in the country can monitor it. =A0Then he tried=
 to get him
> > to sign a lease for a "better" system.
>
> > My friend called me while the salesman was still there and told me what=
 he was
> > saying. =A0I said, "Throw him out of the house. =A0He's a liar." =A0The=
 sales guy gets
> > on the phone with me and tries his nonsense line. =A0I told him I've be=
en in the
> > business over 30 years and that he needs to take a hike.
>
> > As my friend threw him out, he kept insisting that no one could monitor=
 the
> > system. =A0Just for fun, my friend called Bob Campbell's favorite firm =
and asked
> > if they can monitor a Napco P1632. =A0"Of course we can. =A0Would you l=
ike to make
> > an appointment...?"
>
> > I contacted the firm Jim recommended and they will have it taken care o=
f in a
> > couple days when I walk him through the programming. =A0Somehow I don't=
 think the
> > boys down at EMG are happy about me. =A0:)
>
> > --
>
> > Regards,
> > Robert L Bass
>
> EMG was half correct, while they were wrong about not being able to
> monitor Napco the DSC panel they would have installed IS a better
> system...

You should have told your customer to also file a complaint with his
state attorney generals office.