Re: EMG (Ripoff) Security of Sarasota

[mleuck <m.leuck@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Jan 23, 11:46=A0pm, "Robert L Bass" <nore...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I recently gave a system to a friend of mine for his home. =A0It's a Napc=
o P1632.
> He decided to have it monitored so he called EMG, a local outfit. =A0They=
 sent a
> salesman out. The guy told my friend that the Napco system is non-standar=
d and
> that no central station in the country can monitor it. =A0Then he tried t=
o get him
> to sign a lease for a "better" system.
>
> My friend called me while the salesman was still there and told me what h=
e was
> saying. =A0I said, "Throw him out of the house. =A0He's a liar." =A0The s=
ales guy gets
> on the phone with me and tries his nonsense line. =A0I told him I've been=
 in the
> business over 30 years and that he needs to take a hike.
>
> As my friend threw him out, he kept insisting that no one could monitor t=
he
> system. =A0Just for fun, my friend called Bob Campbell's favorite firm an=
d asked
> if they can monitor a Napco P1632. =A0"Of course we can. =A0Would you lik=
e to make
> an appointment...?"
>
> I contacted the firm Jim recommended and they will have it taken care of =
in a
> couple days when I walk him through the programming. =A0Somehow I don't t=
hink the
> boys down at EMG are happy about me. =A0:)
>
> --
>
> Regards,
> Robert L Bass

EMG was half correct, while they were wrong about not being able to
monitor Napco the DSC panel they would have installed IS a better
system...