Re: Esprit 728 keypads

[mleuck <m.leuck@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Feb 23, 7:39=A0am, tourman <robercampb...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Feb 22, 11:54=A0pm, "Doug" <n...@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
>
> > "tourman" <robercampb...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>
> >news:5e9784c5-e180-4704-8228-52a1c4dfe17d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx=
.
> > On Feb 15, 2:27 pm, motley me <to...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > > proguard <sp.kintzoni...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in news:f2c0b47d-b7e0-451=
d-
> > > a54b-8c896ab15...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:
>
> > > > The yellow wire was in the place of green :-) it was an old keypad
> > > > with wires.
>
> > > I see
> > >RHC: =A0Earlier version panels were
> > >junk however, =A0which gave them an unjustified black eye in the view =
of
> > >many installers.
>
> > If they really were junk, then wouldn't the black eye be justifed??
>
> > Doug
>
> RHC: Yes, to a degree: however, they were just starting up at the
> time. They saw there was a major defect and supplied free panels to
> all dealers who needed them to make up things. You cant blame a
> company for a problem; they all have them. It's how they handle the
> problem that shows you what =A0kind of company they are...ie: Detection
> System fiasco with motions and DSC problems with wireless products.
>
> Companies too often only act =A0based on their bottom line, not the
> ethics involved in a situation. It was nice too see a company step up
> to the plate and take responsibility for their mistakes
>
> They took the well deserved punch and got up and made it right

Then later they pulled this crap

http://www.cepro.com/article/court_throws_out_paradox_patent_claim_vs_dsc_a=
dt/K314