[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]
Re: BRINKS HOME SECURITY MAY HAVE DIRECT TIES WITH MADOFF
On Jul 1, 10:34=A0am, Jim Rojas <jro...@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> tourman wrote:
> > RHC:Interesting ! Here there are no such restrictions - hell, we don't
> > even have the most basic of licensing (nor for locksmithing
> > either....go figure). All zones with delay means fewer false alarms
> > (translation; fewer signals for their massive stations to have to
> > handle =A0I would guess....)
>
> I took a look at the licensing in NYC...wow. They might as well not even
> have bothered with licensing.
>
> NYC lists all licensed persons as an ALARM INSTALLERS, not a alarm
> contractors. Not all license holders are installers.
>
> No documented proof of general liability insurance is kept on file or
> verified prior to issuing licensing.
>
> No license numbers are required on business cards or on all vehicles
> used to conduct business...
>
> So anyone with a few bucks in his pocket can take a test, and get a
> license within 90 days...what a joke.
>
> Jim Rojas
Hey that explains Tom Fowler :)
/now running away
alt.security.alarms Main Index |
alt.security.alarms Thread Index |
alt.security.alarms Home |
Archives Home