Re: Protect yourself against Operation Sudden Fall

["alarman" <nospam@xxxxxxxx>]

Joe wrote:
> alarman wrote:
>  you're being clever
>
> thank u
>
>>
>> There is a constitutional right to be free of unreasonable search and
>> seizure.
>
> nothing unreasonable about reading text messages of criminals.
>
>> Well, in my case, it's because it's none of the government's
>> business. And without a warrant based on probable cause, signed by a
>> judge, they have no right. Back to school for you, or are you one of
>> those canadian schmucks who has laid down and spread your legs for
>> the government?
>
> if you think u have privacy in your electronic communications you are
> just being naive. besides if it comes down to stopping San Fran from
> being blown up by a nuke or reading bass text messages I .... oh
> never mind.

Eye on the ball, joe.

Whether or not the government intercepts my private communications is beside
the point I was making; that it's because of the cavalier attitudes of
people like you, with regard to the sanctity of the constitution, which has
led to the erosion of our rights.

That said, I could actually live without San Francisco.

--
js

The voices in my head told me to clean my guns today.