Re: Need A Brinks Manual?

["Steve" <nospam@xxxxxxxxxx>]

"Robert L Bass" <RobertLBass@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:Ug%Ej.193$rb6.43@xxxxxxxxxxx
>
> "Bob La Londe" <nospam@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:fs1ur1$8s5$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> "G. Morgan" <no_em@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>> news:e43d7ca624c223d0ba0e3cf83a6c4415np@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> Robert L Bass wrote:
>>>
>>> >Brinks has the funds and the legal resources to force your anonymous
>> remailer
>>> >to reveal your identity and sue you.  In the process that information
>> will
>>> >become part of the public record.  :^)
>>>
>>> You're a fucking idiot Bass.  You don't know how anonymous remailers
>>> work,
>>> else you wouldn't make such a ridiculous statement.  Now go on and tell
>>> me
>> I'm
>>> wrong because I can't wait to go into details.
>>
>> Depends on the remailer, where its located physically, and what he did
>> before using it to anonymize his IP address.
>
> Regardless if he used 10 remailers to hide, if they want to spend the time
> and effort they can work their way back, one search warrant at a time.

The remailers keep no logs.  Routing is packetized and randomized.  Even
monitoring the datastream at anything other than the initial system is
worthless.   The process is designed to be lawyer proof.