Re: Brinks Home Security Fraud

["Mark Leuck" <mleuck@xxxxxxxxx>]

"tourman" <robercampbell@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:b84516e6-390e-4021-a003-3ae85697f765@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>> Personally, I don't object to a brief, off-topic post.  What I object to
>> are the lengthy, back-and-forth off-topic conversations between you and
>> Bass.  I wouldn't even mind those if you would add the words "inane
>> bullshit" to the subject line of the message.  Then I could simply mark
>> it
>> as read, and ignore it without opening it.  That would be preferable to
>> blocking you altogether.  I disagree with your views on long-term
>> contracts, for example, but your comments on that subject are right on
>> topic, and a valid point of discussion for this newsgroup.  Bass's next
>> party or your future Florida vacation plans are not.
>
> RHC: Check ! Considerate done. The next time someone carries the
> thread off topic with personal matters, we'll both jump on them....

The problem wasn't that the both of you were off topic the problem was that
you carried it through message after message after message.

Anyone else would have long ago taken it to email