Re: Brinks Home Security Fraud

["alarman" <nospam@xxxxxxxx>]

Mark Leuck wrote:
> "tourman" <robercampbell@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:b84516e6-390e-4021-a003-3ae85697f765@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>>> Personally, I don't object to a brief, off-topic post.  What I
>>> object to are the lengthy, back-and-forth off-topic conversations
>>> between you and Bass.  I wouldn't even mind those if you would add
>>> the words "inane bullshit" to the subject line of the message. Then I
>>> could simply mark it
>>> as read, and ignore it without opening it.  That would be
>>> preferable to blocking you altogether.  I disagree with your views
>>> on long-term contracts, for example, but your comments on that
>>> subject are right on topic, and a valid point of discussion for
>>> this newsgroup.  Bass's next party or your future Florida vacation
>>> plans are not.
>>
>> RHC: Check ! Considerate done. The next time someone carries the
>> thread off topic with personal matters, we'll both jump on them....
>
> The problem wasn't that the both of you were off topic the problem
> was that you carried it through message after message after message.
>
> Anyone else would have long ago taken it to email

He knows that.
His brain has been slimed by bASS, and he's gone over to the dark side. He
has allowed himself to be manipulated, and doesn't even know it.

--
js

Cut the RED wire. No...wait!