Re: Brinks Home Security Fraud

[tourman <robercampbell@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Jun 20, 8:16 pm, "Mark Leuck" <mle...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> "tourman" <robercampb...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>
> news:b84516e6-390e-4021-a003-3ae85697f765@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
> >> Personally, I don't object to a brief, off-topic post.  What I object to
> >> are the lengthy, back-and-forth off-topic conversations between you and
> >> Bass.  I wouldn't even mind those if you would add the words "inane
> >> bullshit" to the subject line of the message.  Then I could simply mark
> >> it
> >> as read, and ignore it without opening it.  That would be preferable to
> >> blocking you altogether.  I disagree with your views on long-term
> >> contracts, for example, but your comments on that subject are right on
> >> topic, and a valid point of discussion for this newsgroup.  Bass's next
> >> party or your future Florida vacation plans are not.
>
> > RHC: Check ! Considerate done. The next time someone carries the
> > thread off topic with personal matters, we'll both jump on them....
>
> The problem wasn't that the both of you were off topic the problem was that
> you carried it through message after message after message.
>
> Anyone else would have long ago taken it to email

RHC: Ok Mark, point well made....I'll do that in the future