[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: 2 Partition DSC 1864 Smoke Detector Question

Subject: Re: 2 Partition DSC 1864 Smoke Detector Question
From: G. Morgan <no_em@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 00:33:24 +0000 (UTC)
Newsgroups: alt.security.alarms
References: <31501$4865e8e9$16539@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Nmw9k.4018$Y84.1873@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <cdb9a$48680400$20484@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <_TT9k.4114$Y84.2506@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

Doug wrote:

>Reset of four wire smokes is accomplished by removing power to the smokes
>for a few seconds, you can have the four wire smokes on different zones so
>you can identify which building caused the alarm and still use a common
>reset, but Jewellfish brings up a possibly overlooked issue if you are
>located in the US. The 1864 isn't rated for commercial fire in the US.


Is the zone expander even listed for fire zones?

--
How To Pretend You Give A Shit About The Election
http://www.theonion.com/content/video/today_now_how_to_pretend_you_give

References:
- 2 Partition DSC 1864 Smoke Detector Question
  - From: Mike Schumann
- Re: 2 Partition DSC 1864 Smoke Detector Question
  - From: Doug
- Re: 2 Partition DSC 1864 Smoke Detector Question
  - From: Mike Schumann
- Re: 2 Partition DSC 1864 Smoke Detector Question
  - From: Doug

Prev by Message: Re: Brinks Home Security Fraud
Next by Message: Door Openers
Previous by thread: Re: 2 Partition DSC 1864 Smoke Detector Question
Next by thread: Re: 2 Partition DSC 1864 Smoke Detector Question
Index(es):
- Message
- Thread

alt.security.alarms Main Index | alt.security.alarms Thread Index | alt.security.alarms Home | Archives Home