Re: Brinks Home Security Fraud

[Joe <spam@xxxxxxxxx>]

Mark Leuck wrote:
>
> "Joe" <spam@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:r6a5k.5478$Nr.2329@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Mark Leuck wrote:
>>>
>>> "Joe" <spam@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>>> news:oe95k.5643$Xe.4014@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>> Robert L Bass wrote:
>>>>> "Mark Leuck" wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> His idea of fair most likely involves a service call to not only
>>>>>> replace the battery but to test and verify proper system operation
>>>>>> and fix other potential problems the customer may not be aware of.
>>>>>
>>>>> Leave it to Leuck to try to justify Brinks
>>>>>
>>>>>> Your idea of fair is contracting a third party to mail the
>>>>>> customer a box containing a battery
>>>>>
>>>>> Most customers seem to realize they're not going to get a service
>>>>> visit when they order a battery online.  The real difference is I
>>>>> charge a fair price and give my customers more than the level of
>>>>> support they expect. Brinks charges outrageous prices and gives
>>>>> people lawsuits.
>>>>>
>>>> don't forget you are abetting pollution of the environment by
>>>> advising your vict err customers to throw the batteries in the
>>>> trash.  so actually that makes the rest of the planet and all
>>>> ensuing generations your victim.
>>>
>>> The funny part about that is I know the company who supplies Brinks
>>> with batteries and takes the used batteries from Brinks for recycling
>> excuse my density but how is that funny?
>
> He will come back and say Brinks doesn't care about dead batteries
> either however that is not the case
heh heh.