Re: the police was dispatched to ... the wrong house

["Mark Leuck" <m..leuck@xxxxxxxxx>]

"Roland More" <NoSpamroland@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:46dfed9d$0$15359$4c368faf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Well you don't work where you say you do then.

Where did I say I worked?

> You might push a broom or a
> keyboard there,

You don't push a keyboard

> but you have proven that you're simply to stupid to parse
> out any meaningful information when it is right there in front of you.

As of yet no useful information seems to be available from you, you seem to
have no problems pushing out accusations but many when it comes to backing
them up, instead you seem to beat around the bush and post "meaningless"
things

> Why
> don't you show that information to one of the names on the list I
provided?

You mean George Washington, or George Forman or George Bush?

> I know why, so you can still persist in this "I don't get it mode". No
> worries, it is better to see how truly stupid you are rather than to hear
> more lies about what didn't happen. However, if you are the least bit
> curious there are names you should recognize on that list aren't there?
> Maybe next time you show up to clean the place you could stop sweeping for
a
> second and ask one of the guys on that list to explain what he is seeing
> (that you simply can't or won't), or call him at ext 3123. Even better, my
> guess is that several of those names actually already remember first hand
> what happened, if their memory works for more than a day or so. I suspect
> you are working at a very low level and pay grade not to see the
information
> you need is right there, in an ever so slightly cryptic form, and
apparently
> that is way over your pay grade to parse it out. You really deserve no
> further replies. You are a pure fraud as well as a fool.

Here's something to try, attempt to post something slightly less cryptic so
people might know what you are talking about