Re: An email from yoursecuritysource.com's hosting provider

["Roland Moore" <nospam@xxxxxxxxxx>]

>They can't, because there simply isn't any.  Jim is a >scape-goat" for
someone at Brinks that desperately >wants to keep his job by blowing smoke
all over to >cover his own inadequacies

I hope someone ferrets this fool out.

>"Free at last, free at last!"
>Martin Luther King

Is that who said that? I thought it came from the mouths of guys leaving
divorce court for the last time!

"Frank Olson" <use_the_email_links@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:cnlUi.145504$Da.43769@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Roland Moore wrote:
> > "Never do anything against conscience
> > even if the state demands it."
> > Albert Einstein
> >
> > These guys are really something else. I believe if you said you were
hosting
> > the material from Jim's site via smoke signals, I believe that they
would
> > actually be up there not only trying to piss on the fire to put it out,
but
> > sending legal notice to The Meteorological Service of Canada for not
> > preventing the wind from spreading the information.
>
> I "believe" you're right.  It's sort of become a runaway train.
>
>
> >
> > To me this is nothing more now than a simple temper tantrum by Brink's
legal
> > representation, to be precise a loss of mental balance or composure,
esp. by
> > an outburst of anger or irritation. Someone at Brinks needs to ask for a
> > refund, and then find an unruly three year old at any super market to
work
> > as a replacement for what they have now.
>
> Actually, I believe Brinks isn't being all that "honest" with their
> legal council.  When you get someone with Mr. Sableman's background
> putting forth untruthful statements in written presentations to a
> Federal Court, I'd say that's pretty serious business.  Perhaps he
> should be paying more attention to this Newsgroup than listening to
> whomever is feeding him the inaccurate information on Jim's website and
> "raison d'etre".
>
>
> >
> > When is Brink's legal representation going to focus on real legal
issues,
> > like showing some sort of loss for any of the activities Brinks is
trying to
> > prevent?
>
> They can't, because there simply isn't any.  Jim is a "scape-goat" for
> someone at Brinks that desperately wants to keep his job by blowing
> smoke all over to cover his own inadequacies.
>
>
> > And when is there going to be any sort of sane balance between the
> > value of the loss and the cost of the remedy?
>
> Brinks has bucks.  Lots of them.  They can sue every dealer from
> Guatemala to the northern-most tip of Baffin Island and still have
> enough left over to pay their legal expenses, the CEO, and a few techs
> (that drive their vans home).
>
>
> > For a man of Mr. Sableman's
> > age, education and experience I would not expect this, his efforts to
date
> > strike me a purely sophomoric.
>
> As I said earlier, I don't think Mr. Sableman has been dealt a fair hand
> by Brinks.  It's kinda like when someone sends you into a boxing ring
> wearing woolen mittens instead of the proper gloves.
>
>
> >
> > "Freedom is the power
> > to live as you will.
> > Who then lives as he wills?"
> > Cicero
>
> "Free at last, free at last!"
> Martin Luther King