[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: Brinks v Jim Rojas New Motion

Subject: Re: Brinks v Jim Rojas New Motion
From: Tommy <tommy@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2007 14:47:20 -0000
Newsgroups: alt.security.alarms
References: <470BFCC8.4080809@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <Xns99C545E5A2191tommynospamcom@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <H14Pi.153$D6.47@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Slob <pre@xxxxx> wrote in news:H14Pi.153$D6.47@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:

> Tommy wrote:
>
>> Wouldn't taking screen shots of someone else's copyrighted material
>> constitute a crime?  The whole no use/reproduction with out written
>> consent thing.
>>
> They had it posted on their website for any and all to download at one
> time.  now all of a sudden its top secret?
>

Not Brinks. Jim's tech help. Them taking screenshots and using them without
permission would violate his copyright wouldn't it?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Brinks v Jim Rojas New Motion
  - From: Jim Rojas
- Re: Brinks v Jim Rojas New Motion
  - From: Jim Rojas

References:
- Brinks v Jim Rojas New Motion
  - From: Jim Rojas
- Re: Brinks v Jim Rojas New Motion
  - From: Tommy
- Re: Brinks v Jim Rojas New Motion
  - From: Slob

Prev by Message: WTB: Bosch Radionics Parts
Next by Message: Re: FBI XL-2T
Previous by thread: Re: Brinks v Jim Rojas New Motion
Next by thread: Re: Brinks v Jim Rojas New Motion
Index(es):
- Message
- Thread

alt.security.alarms Main Index | alt.security.alarms Thread Index | alt.security.alarms Home | Archives Home