[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: Brinks v Jim Rojas New Motion



> 2. Rojas has recently posted on his website, located at
> www.tech-man.com, a software program titled ?Tech Help.? The Tech Help
> program contains instructions which
> clearly describe how to circumvent the lock out protection on Brink?s
> Home Security control
> panels. Plaintiff has prepared a Declaration of David Yorkey, Brink?s
> Senior Manager of
> Product Technology, describing his recent review and analysis of the
> Tech Help program, and
> setting forth screen shots from that program. By separate motion,
> Plaintiff has requested leave
> Case 3:07-cv-00437 Document 32 Filed 10/09/2007 Page 1 of 9
> 4599823 - 2 -
> to file the Declaration separately in an ex parte submission under
> seal. (As set forth in that
> motion, because the Yorkey declaration identifies the trade secret
> information disclosed by
> Rojas, a public filing of the declaration, or sharing of it with
> Rojas, would in Brink?s opinion
> defeat the purpose of this motion.)


Wouldn't taking screen shots of someone else's copyrighted material
constitute a crime?  The whole no use/reproduction with out written consent
thing.



alt.security.alarms Main Index | alt.security.alarms Thread Index | alt.security.alarms Home | Archives Home