[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: Brinks v Jim Rojas New Motion

Subject: Re: Brinks v Jim Rojas New Motion
From: Slob <pre@xxxxx>
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2007 09:00:30 -0400
Newsgroups: alt.security.alarms
References: <470BFCC8.4080809@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <Xns99C545E5A2191tommynospamcom@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

Tommy wrote:

> Wouldn't taking screen shots of someone else's copyrighted material
> constitute a crime?  The whole no use/reproduction with out written consent
> thing.
>
They had it posted on their website for any and all to download at one
time.  now all of a sudden its top secret?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Brinks v Jim Rojas New Motion
  - From: Tommy

References:
- Brinks v Jim Rojas New Motion
  - From: Jim Rojas
- Re: Brinks v Jim Rojas New Motion
  - From: Tommy

Prev by Message: Re: Brinks BHS2000D Hack
Next by Message: Re: POTUS a big PITA
Previous by thread: Re: Brinks v Jim Rojas New Motion
Next by thread: Re: Brinks v Jim Rojas New Motion
Index(es):
- Message
- Thread

alt.security.alarms Main Index | alt.security.alarms Thread Index | alt.security.alarms Home | Archives Home