Re: Brinks v Jim Rojas New Motion

[Jim Rojas <jrojas@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Tommy wrote:
> Slob <pre@xxxxx> wrote in news:H14Pi.153$D6.47@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:
>
>> Tommy wrote:
>>
>>> Wouldn't taking screen shots of someone else's copyrighted material
>>> constitute a crime?  The whole no use/reproduction with out written
>>> consent thing.
>>>
>> They had it posted on their website for any and all to download at one
>> time.  now all of a sudden its top secret?
>>
>
> Not Brinks. Jim's tech help. Them taking screenshots and using them without
> permission would violate his copyright wouldn't it?

That is correct. But I will address that issue when the time is right.

Jim Rojas