Re: the police was dispatched to ... the wrong house

["Mark Leuck" <m..leuck@xxxxxxxxx>]

"Robert L Bass" <RobertLBass@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:WjQwi.7241$%t4.5831@xxxxxxxxxxx
> >> It has everything to do with being cheap.
> >> You can't load the lines with as many accounts
> >> when you receive daily tests and open/close
> >> signals as when you don't.  If you knew anything
> >> about running a central station you would know
> >> that.
> >
> > Actually I would as I've dealt with all of our
> > receivers which consists of...
>
> As usual, you miss the point.  It's not your knowledge
> of receivers that is so obviously lacking.

Your knowledge seems to be lacking on how many receivers and line cards the
OP's central station has, in fact you don't even know how many accounts they
service, or who the OP's original installer is/was, you don't know if he's
setup to do daily test signals, you don't know what format he's sending on
and you don't know for a fact they don't deal with Caller ID, in other words
you only know a few sentences from a poster.

> You know
> nothing about *running* a central station.  You're like
> the telephone company operator who spends her day
> routing calls but knows nothing about the business
> of the phone company.

Oh yes, tell us all about your single receiver central station run out of
your bedroom that wasn't UL listed and had no backup site

> u don't know that, you have no idea what they did after the dispatch
>
> Again, you miss the point.  Had they done the right thing they could have
helped the installer and the homeowner avoid sending the
> wrong account in the first place.  I keep explaining how they could have
found the error and fixed it before the false signal and
> you keep babbling about how they handled the alarm signal once it came in.

No you miss the point, they would not have fixed the error before the false
signal because the false signal WAS the error, they could not have helped
the installer who is sending the signal from another residence until AFTER
the dispatch because at that time with or without Caller ID they would STILL
have to dispatch. And that is assuming the installer or DIY'er  at the other
residence who is sending signals even answers the phone. if they don't and
the person who rightly has that account doesn't you dispatch and it sounds
like thats exactly what happened.

> That is so typical of you, Leuck.  Instead of dealing
> with the facts which show that companies like your employer are negligent
you focus on a side point which has nothing to do with the
> reason they screw up all the time.

You are the one who changed the subject into daily test signals and free
opening/closings for commercial properties not I

> I won't dignify the rest of your drivel with a response.

Well it's because you have none