Re: 15 sec dialer delay

["Crash Gordon" <webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

NOT having a choice really sucks. We have our own set of false alarm
reduction procedures that I find more effective than delaying transmission
of a signal.


"Mark Leuck" <m..leuck@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:OcydnVEh1ta5_Z_YnZ2dnUVZ_u6dnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
|
| "Crash Gordon" <webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
| news:45024574$0$3567$815e3792@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| > I do 15P's fairly often, I have noticed that it's defaulted for dialer
| > delay, but it can be changed.
| > Are you saying it's gonna be changed then?
|
| Version 5 lets you remove that by adding the zone into zone list 6, in
other
| words you CAN remove it but it will be more of a pain than its worth
getting
| rid of it
|
| ITI has had one for years now, DSC added it in the 5020 and the new v3.2
| 5010 and as stated earlier Caddx now has it.
|
|
| >
| >
| > "Mark Leuck" <m..leuck@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
| > news:79GdnSyFdpuflp_YnZ2dnUVZ_uWdnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| > |
| > | "Crash Gordon" <webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
| > | news:45015e61$0$10298$815e3792@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| > | > I've never used dialer delay. I want to know what happening and it's
a
| > | REAL
| > | > pain in the butt trying to explain to the old farts out there...why
| > didn't
| > | > we call when my alarm went off??!!! What alarm?
| > | >
| > | > So then the SIA thing will give the bad guys 45 secs to enter a
delay
| > door
| > | > 30+15 dialer delay...that sucks...effectively puts 15 sec response
| delay
| > | on
| > | > everything. Will 15 sec dialer delay effect panic, hold up and fire
| > too???
| > | > If so I see lotsa liability there.
| > |
| > | No its burg only
| > |
| > | If you really want info just go to Honeywell's site and download the
| > | Vista-15P/20PSIA manuals if they have them, you'll see what I mean.
| > |
| > |
| > | > "Mark Leuck" <m..leuck@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
| > | > news:WZ6dncggFvNdeJ3YnZ2dnUVZ_q2dnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| > | > |
| > | > | "Crash Gordon" <webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
| > | > | news:45005f9e$0$34070$815e3792@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| > | > | > btw, dialer delays are annoying.
| > | > |
| > | > | Get used to it, by the beginning of next year all panels must
follow
| > the
| > | > new
| > | > | SIA standards which mandate dialer delays that cannot be
programmed
| > out
| > | of
| > | > | the system. And the wonderful exit alarm...recent
| closings.....minimum
| > | 30
| > | > | second entry delay......etc
| > | > |
| > | > | I will feast on your pain :)
| > | > |
| > | > |
| > | > |
| > | > | > "Don" <don@xxxxxx> wrote in message
| > | > | > news:%GiKg.18369$ry2.8321@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| > | > | > | Maybe I am over looking something here but these new GE panels
| > | [NX8V2]
| > | > | > that
| > | > | > | have a built in 15 sec delay on the dialer in order to
decrease
| > | false
| > | > | > alarms
| > | > | > | seem to be causing problems when used with a digital Uplink
| anynet
| > | > | instead
| > | > | > | of solving them.  Customer comes in wrong door and sets off
| > instant
| > | > | alarm
| > | > | > | and goes to keypad and disarms system withiin the 15 sec.
| digital
| > | > | uplink
| > | > | > | sends generic burg.  Panel sends nothing.  no alarm, no
cancel,
| no
| > | > | > nothing.
| > | > | > | How is that going to decrease false alarms?  Am I missing
| > something?
| > | > | > | At least with the old NX8 central would get alarm and cancel
| > signals
| > | > to
| > | > | go
| > | > | > | along with generic burg from uplink.  Seems the powers that be
| who
| > | > built
| > | > | > in
| > | > | > | this 15 sec delay should have thought about this or at least
| come
| > up
| > | > | with
| > | > | > a
| > | > | > | full data digital like the NX 591 was a full data analog.
| > | > | > |
| > | > | > |
| > | > | >
| > | > | >
| > | > |
| > | > |
| > | >
| > | >
| > |
| > |
| >
| >
|
|