Re: 15 sec dialer delay

["Mark Leuck" <m..leuck@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

"Crash Gordon" <webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:45024574$0$3567$815e3792@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> I do 15P's fairly often, I have noticed that it's defaulted for dialer
> delay, but it can be changed.
> Are you saying it's gonna be changed then?

Version 5 lets you remove that by adding the zone into zone list 6, in other
words you CAN remove it but it will be more of a pain than its worth getting
rid of it

ITI has had one for years now, DSC added it in the 5020 and the new v3.2
5010 and as stated earlier Caddx now has it.


>
>
> "Mark Leuck" <m..leuck@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:79GdnSyFdpuflp_YnZ2dnUVZ_uWdnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> |
> | "Crash Gordon" <webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> | news:45015e61$0$10298$815e3792@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> | > I've never used dialer delay. I want to know what happening and it's a
> | REAL
> | > pain in the butt trying to explain to the old farts out there...why
> didn't
> | > we call when my alarm went off??!!! What alarm?
> | >
> | > So then the SIA thing will give the bad guys 45 secs to enter a delay
> door
> | > 30+15 dialer delay...that sucks...effectively puts 15 sec response
delay
> | on
> | > everything. Will 15 sec dialer delay effect panic, hold up and fire
> too???
> | > If so I see lotsa liability there.
> |
> | No its burg only
> |
> | If you really want info just go to Honeywell's site and download the
> | Vista-15P/20PSIA manuals if they have them, you'll see what I mean.
> |
> |
> | > "Mark Leuck" <m..leuck@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> | > news:WZ6dncggFvNdeJ3YnZ2dnUVZ_q2dnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> | > |
> | > | "Crash Gordon" <webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> | > | news:45005f9e$0$34070$815e3792@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> | > | > btw, dialer delays are annoying.
> | > |
> | > | Get used to it, by the beginning of next year all panels must follow
> the
> | > new
> | > | SIA standards which mandate dialer delays that cannot be programmed
> out
> | of
> | > | the system. And the wonderful exit alarm...recent
closings.....minimum
> | 30
> | > | second entry delay......etc
> | > |
> | > | I will feast on your pain :)
> | > |
> | > |
> | > |
> | > | > "Don" <don@xxxxxx> wrote in message
> | > | > news:%GiKg.18369$ry2.8321@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> | > | > | Maybe I am over looking something here but these new GE panels
> | [NX8V2]
> | > | > that
> | > | > | have a built in 15 sec delay on the dialer in order to decrease
> | false
> | > | > alarms
> | > | > | seem to be causing problems when used with a digital Uplink
anynet
> | > | instead
> | > | > | of solving them.  Customer comes in wrong door and sets off
> instant
> | > | alarm
> | > | > | and goes to keypad and disarms system withiin the 15 sec.
digital
> | > | uplink
> | > | > | sends generic burg.  Panel sends nothing.  no alarm, no cancel,
no
> | > | > nothing.
> | > | > | How is that going to decrease false alarms?  Am I missing
> something?
> | > | > | At least with the old NX8 central would get alarm and cancel
> signals
> | > to
> | > | go
> | > | > | along with generic burg from uplink.  Seems the powers that be
who
> | > built
> | > | > in
> | > | > | this 15 sec delay should have thought about this or at least
come
> up
> | > | with
> | > | > a
> | > | > | full data digital like the NX 591 was a full data analog.
> | > | > |
> | > | > |
> | > | >
> | > | >
> | > |
> | > |
> | >
> | >
> |
> |
>
>