[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: 15 sec dialer delay



I do 15P's fairly often, I have noticed that it's defaulted for dialer
delay, but it can be changed.
Are you saying it's gonna be changed then?


"Mark Leuck" <m..leuck@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:79GdnSyFdpuflp_YnZ2dnUVZ_uWdnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
|
| "Crash Gordon" <webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
| news:45015e61$0$10298$815e3792@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| > I've never used dialer delay. I want to know what happening and it's a
| REAL
| > pain in the butt trying to explain to the old farts out there...why
didn't
| > we call when my alarm went off??!!! What alarm?
| >
| > So then the SIA thing will give the bad guys 45 secs to enter a delay
door
| > 30+15 dialer delay...that sucks...effectively puts 15 sec response delay
| on
| > everything. Will 15 sec dialer delay effect panic, hold up and fire
too???
| > If so I see lotsa liability there.
|
| No its burg only
|
| If you really want info just go to Honeywell's site and download the
| Vista-15P/20PSIA manuals if they have them, you'll see what I mean.
|
|
| > "Mark Leuck" <m..leuck@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
| > news:WZ6dncggFvNdeJ3YnZ2dnUVZ_q2dnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| > |
| > | "Crash Gordon" <webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
| > | news:45005f9e$0$34070$815e3792@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| > | > btw, dialer delays are annoying.
| > |
| > | Get used to it, by the beginning of next year all panels must follow
the
| > new
| > | SIA standards which mandate dialer delays that cannot be programmed
out
| of
| > | the system. And the wonderful exit alarm...recent closings.....minimum
| 30
| > | second entry delay......etc
| > |
| > | I will feast on your pain :)
| > |
| > |
| > |
| > | > "Don" <don@xxxxxx> wrote in message
| > | > news:%GiKg.18369$ry2.8321@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| > | > | Maybe I am over looking something here but these new GE panels
| [NX8V2]
| > | > that
| > | > | have a built in 15 sec delay on the dialer in order to decrease
| false
| > | > alarms
| > | > | seem to be causing problems when used with a digital Uplink anynet
| > | instead
| > | > | of solving them.  Customer comes in wrong door and sets off
instant
| > | alarm
| > | > | and goes to keypad and disarms system withiin the 15 sec.  digital
| > | uplink
| > | > | sends generic burg.  Panel sends nothing.  no alarm, no cancel, no
| > | > nothing.
| > | > | How is that going to decrease false alarms?  Am I missing
something?
| > | > | At least with the old NX8 central would get alarm and cancel
signals
| > to
| > | go
| > | > | along with generic burg from uplink.  Seems the powers that be who
| > built
| > | > in
| > | > | this 15 sec delay should have thought about this or at least come
up
| > | with
| > | > a
| > | > | full data digital like the NX 591 was a full data analog.
| > | > |
| > | > |
| > | >
| > | >
| > |
| > |
| >
| >
|
|




alt.security.alarms Main Index | alt.security.alarms Thread Index | alt.security.alarms Home | Archives Home