Re: ADT Yard Signs

["Roland Moore" <roland@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

You have to forget what seems to be right, ethical, common sense and
even what may have been law last year. None of that comes into play when
attorneys are involved.

Truer words were never spoken.

"Bob Worthy" <securinc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:uon2h.18944$Fd7.3171@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> "Crash Gordon" <webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:4549f705$0$10310$815e3792@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Well, yes..they were representing themselves as being me/my company. They
>> didn't actually have any licenses or a legal business.
>>
>> This is interesting though. So you guys are kinda saying that if I bought
> a
>> used ADT service truck with their signage on it, and drove it around not
>> intending to do any alarm business that ADT or lets say just parked it on
> my
>> driveway - would have no case? (tangent from OP...just posing another ?)
>
> In your case it may have been a different issue than what is being talked
> about here. It is the action of the individual that "could" constitute
> some
> sort of illegal act. If he was an unlicensed person, driving an ADT truck
> and not employeed by ADT, out there selling, installing, servicing alarms
> as
> an ADT whatever, there may be some sort of fraud and deception thing going
> on, not to mention any of the unlicensed contractor penaltys and who knows
> what else. But simply having possession of a sign, or a truck etc. with a
> logo on it is not illegal unless it was stolen. Even with that, the crime
> would be possession of stolen property and not anything to do with the
> logo.
> Stealing an ADT truck would carry no heavier penalty than stealing RLB's
> Camary. You have to forget what seems to be right, ethical, common sense
> and
> even what may have been law last year. None of that comes into play when
> attorneys are involved.
>
>