[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: wire vs wired

Subject: Re: wire vs wired
From: "Doug L" <vssdoug@xxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2006 07:53:48 -0800
Newsgroups: alt.security.alarms
References: <rd1Hf.18942$Fw6.18485@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <it3qu11i5stnvk1ak17f2uc1ftlnthrvvp@xxxxxxx> <8%8Hf.2276$Ly6.365@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <XFaHf.13586$eR.6428@fed1read03> <ULaHf.13587$eR.13556@fed1read03> <_AnHf.6$W84.870@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

 binnoculous, when they do both eyes

Doug L

--

"Crash Gordon" <webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:_AnHf.6$W84.870@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> innoculous ~ when someone pokes you in they eye by accident?
>
>
> "Doug L" <vssdoug@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:ULaHf.13587$eR.13556@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> | Make that innocuous, not innoculous
> |
> | Doug L

Follow-Ups:
- Re: wire vs wired
  - From: Crash Gordon

References:
- wire vs wired
  - From: Harry Dope
- Re: wire vs wired
  - From: Robert L Bass
- Re: wire vs wired
  - From: Bob Worthy
- Re: wire vs wired
  - From: Doug L
- Re: wire vs wired
  - From: Doug L
- Re: wire vs wired
  - From: Crash Gordon

Prev by Message: Re: Legality of video survaillence
Next by Message: Re: wire vs wired
Previous by thread: Re: wire vs wired
Next by thread: Re: wire vs wired
Index(es):
- Message
- Thread

alt.security.alarms Main Index | alt.security.alarms Thread Index | alt.security.alarms Home | Archives Home